Growth & Development

Lusby Villas

A proposed 276-unit apartment complex in the Lusby Town Center - documented from first approval in 2021 through ongoing appellate litigation in 2026. One of the most contested development decisions in Calvert County in recent years.

276
Proposed dwelling units
26.2 ac
Site area, Lusby Parkway
4-3
Planning Commission approval vote
Pending
Appellate Court of Maryland

Current status - June 2026

The project is on hold pending the outcome of Save Lusby Inc.'s appeal to the Appellate Court of Maryland, filed in September 2025. In January 2026, the Calvert County Board of Appeals voted to grant the developer tolling status - pausing the site plan's expiration clock while litigation is active. Construction cannot proceed until the appeal is resolved.

If the appellate court upholds the circuit court ruling, the developer may resume the permitting process. If the appeal succeeds, the Planning Commission's subdivision approval would be vacated.

What is Lusby Villas?

Lusby Villas is a multi-family residential development proposed for 11770 Lusby Parkway - a 26.23-acre parcel located within the Lusby Town Center zone. The land is owned by John Gott Jr., a local businessman whose family has owned it for several decades. The project is being developed by Quality Built Homes, whose principal Rodney Gertz also serves on the county's Transferable Development Rights (TDR) committee.

The project would consist of 276 multi-family dwelling units plus community amenities. It is permitted as a use under the Lusby Town Center Zoning Ordinance. The site borders Chesapeake Ranch Estates - the largest residential community in Calvert County - and sits near Drum Point along Rousby Hall Road.

A central point of contention is that the project's zoning basis derives from the original Lusby Town Center master plan, which opponents argue predates current infrastructure realities by approximately two decades and has not been meaningfully updated.

2005

6.3 acres of forest retention area recorded on the parcel to satisfy forest conservation requirements for Lusby Center subdivision. This existing FRA would later constrain the Lusby Villas development footprint.

2006

Stormwater management easement conveyed to the county. Retention pond constructed to satisfy requirements for Lusby Parkway construction.

Mar. 2021

Planning CommissionConcept site plan approved by the Planning Commission under CSPR-138111, authorizing 276 multi-family dwelling units. Project publicly revealed for the first time.

Community petition circulated on Change.org calling for a third-party impact assessment of roads and schools before construction proceeds. Commissioner Mike Hart raises concerns in subsequent work sessions, stating he has never had a Lusby resident ask him to build more apartments.

Nov. 2021

BOCCCommissioner Hart raises concerns at a BOCC work session: "It looks like there is ample apartments on the books and existing." Calls Calvert "a bedroom community" and proposes requiring five TDRs per unit for future apartment projects. Developer Rodney Gertz of Quality Built Homes argues for grandfathering projects already well into the approval process.

Feb. 2021 - Jan. 2023

Environmental and regulatory review period. Applicant provides updated forest stand delineation (noting two hardwood stands and 13 specimen trees), updated nontidal wetland delineation confirming Cleve Branch and surrounding wetlands, and a Jurisdictional Determination request to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Maryland Department of Environment confirms 25-foot wetland buffer is sufficient. USACE grants the Jurisdictional Determination in January 2023.

Apr. 2024

Administrative Variance granted for removal of the 13 specimen trees on the parcel.

May 15, 2024

Planning CommissionPreliminary subdivision plan presented to the full Planning Commission. Planning Commissioner Christopher Gadway moves to defer pending an updated traffic study - motion ends in a 3-3 tie, broken by Chairman Gregory Kernan to not defer. Project then approved in a split vote. Planning Commissioners Gadway, McQueen, and Freeland vote no.

Jul. 9, 2024

Public meetingBOCC holds informational public meeting at Southern Community Center in Lusby (7-9 p.m.), livestreamed on YouTube. Residents permitted to speak. Commissioners Hart and Grasso voice opposition to the project. Attendee Sarah Weems, a Chamber of Commerce member, cites "lack of transparency" in the approval process.

Jul. 17, 2024

Planning CommissionPlanning Commissioner Freeland moves to rescind the May subdivision approval. Motion denied 4-3.

Aug. 21, 2024

Planning CommissionFinal subdivision plat certification approved 4-3. Final plat recorded in land records the following day, August 22.

Aug. 29, 2024

Updated traffic study approved by the Department of Public Works - a required component for site plan approval.

Sep. 5, 2024

CommunityLusby residents meet and organize Save Lusby Inc., a volunteer nonprofit advocacy group, to pursue legal options to challenge the project.

Sep. 18, 2024

LegalFive Lusby residents - Sean McGuire, Megan Farringer, Kyle Farringer, Terry Singer, and Chris Lee - file a petition for judicial review in Calvert County Circuit Court, represented by attorneys G. Macy Nelson and Alex Votaw.

Jan. 8, 2026

Board of AppealsPublic hearing on whether the zoning ordinance allows tolling of the site plan's expiration during active litigation. Planning & Zoning had argued only a court could grant tolling. Developer John Gott Jr. appears and notes he is "$2.5 million into this project." The Board of Appeals takes two votes: first declares (3-2, with members Ireland, Clark, and Briscoe in favor) that an error occurred in the original denial of tolling status, then votes unanimously (5-0) to grant the tolling. The site plan's expiration clock is paused for the duration of litigation.

Jul. 2025

Circuit CourtCalvert County Circuit Court Judge Michelle Jaktlisch (visiting judge) rules to uphold the Planning Commission's approval. The circuit court case is officially closed. Save Lusby Inc. states it is "extremely disappointed" and will consult its attorneys on next steps.

Sep. 2025

Appellate CourtSave Lusby attorney G. Macy Nelson confirms an appeal to the Appellate Court of Maryland was filed by September 19, 2025. Project remains on hold pending outcome.

Present

PendingAppeal to the Appellate Court of Maryland is active. Project on hold. Outcome will determine whether construction may proceed under current approvals.

Traffic and roads
Rousby Hall Road is described by residents as already congested. Multiple Planning Commission members cited traffic concerns in their dissenting votes. A motion to defer pending an updated traffic study failed on a tied 3-3 vote. The traffic study was later approved by the Department of Public Works, but residents and opponents continue to dispute its adequacy.
School capacity
South County schools are described as already overcrowded. Community members and petition signatories called for an independent third-party impact assessment of schools before approvals were finalized. No independent assessment was commissioned. The county's standard Annual Pupil Forecast report was used instead.
Forest and wetlands
The site contains existing forest retention area, nontidal wetlands, and 13 specimen trees - all designated for removal or mitigation. The project proposes clearing more forest than the regulatory breakeven point, requiring 26.23 acres of off-site mitigation on the Gott Property in Prince Frederick. That mitigation area drains into the Patuxent River watershed through Hunting Creek and Mill Creek.
Rural character
Opponents argue a 276-unit apartment complex is inconsistent with the county's rural character and with Calvert 2040, the Comprehensive Plan emphasizing agricultural preservation and responsible growth. The project's master plan basis predates the current Comprehensive Plan by over a decade and critics argue it has not been updated to reflect current community values or priorities.
Transparency
Community members, Save Lusby Inc., and a Calvert County Chamber of Commerce attendee all raised concerns about the process, citing limited public notice, the use of an aging master plan as the approval basis, and the absence of an independent impact study. The July 2024 informational meeting was not a standard part of the approval process and was held after the preliminary plan had already been approved.
Infrastructure capacity
Commissioner Hart stated at the July 2024 public meeting that Lusby "doesn't have the infrastructure" to accommodate a development of this scale. Water, sewer, and utility capacity relative to the project's demand have not been independently assessed. The project borders the largest residential community in Calvert County.

Save Lusby Inc.

Save Lusby Inc. is a volunteer, community-driven nonprofit organization formed in September 2024 specifically to challenge the Lusby Villas approval through the legal system. The group describes its mission as preserving "the unique character, natural beauty, and small-town spirit of Lusby" and advocates for responsible growth that respects residents' needs and values.

The group is funding its legal challenge through GoFundMe donations. No board members are paid - all work is done pro bono. The organization maintains a website, YouTube channel, and social media presence where they document updates on the project and legal proceedings.

Save Lusby Inc. is an independent community organization and is not affiliated with Protect Calvert. Protect Calvert does not direct, fund, or speak for this group. We are linking to their resources because they are the primary community organization actively tracking and challenging this development.

Commissioner Mike Hart (R, District 1 - Incumbent, seeking fourth term): "It looks like there is ample apartments on the books and existing." Stated no Lusby resident he has ever spoken with has asked for more apartments. Called Calvert "a bedroom community" whose newcomers are "leaving areas that reflect a lot of apartments." Stated at the July 2024 public meeting that Lusby "doesn't have the infrastructure" for a project of this scale. Has consistently opposed large-scale apartment development throughout his tenure.

Sources: Southern MD News, Nov. 22, 2021  ·  Southern MD News, Oct. 1, 2024

Commissioner Catherine M. Grasso (R, District 3 - Incumbent, seeking second term): Voiced opposition to the Lusby Villas project. Attended and participated in the July 9, 2024 public informational meeting opposing the project's advancement.

Sources: Southern MD News, Oct. 1, 2024  ·  The BayNet, Jul. 25, 2025

Commissioner Todd Ireland (R, At-Large - Did not advance past June 2026 primary): At a Calvert County Chamber of Commerce event, defended the project: "There has been a lot of mistruths about this project."

Source: Southern MD News, Sep. 2, 2025

Commissioner Earl F. "Buddy" Hance (R, At-Large - Did not advance past June 2026 primary): Stated that if the BOCC were to take action to kill the Lusby Villas plan, it would result in a lawsuit the county would lose. Did not express documented opposition to the project.

Source: Southern MD News, Sep. 2, 2025

Rodney Gertz, Quality Built Homes (developer): "Nobody wants to see runaway growth. People want Calvert to be country. They want it to be rural, me included. The sliding scale was brought in to actually encourage a few of these projects. I would just ask that we 'grandfather' people that have already spent millions of dollars on projects that are basically vested."

Source: Southern MD News, Nov. 22, 2021

John Gott Jr. (landowner): At the January 2026 Board of Appeals hearing: "I'm $2.5 million into this project. It doesn't seem fair. It doesn't seem right." Noted his family has owned the land and paid taxes on it for several decades and that the parcel sits within the Lusby Town Center where development is intended to occur.

Source: Southern MD News, Jan. 12, 2026
Note: No documented public statement on Lusby Villas has been found from the seven 2026 general election candidates beyond Hart and Grasso. Protect Calvert will update this section as statements are recorded. Corrections and submissions welcome at info@protectcalvert.org.
1. How will the Appellate Court of Maryland rule on Save Lusby Inc.'s challenge to the Planning Commission's approval?
2. If the appeal fails and construction proceeds, will the new Board of County Commissioners seek any additional conditions, mitigation measures, or community benefit agreements from the developer?
3. Will any of the 2026 general election candidates make specific public commitments regarding Lusby Villas or the broader question of high-density residential development in Lusby Town Center?
4. Has the original Lusby Town Center master plan been formally updated to reflect current infrastructure capacity and community planning goals? If not, should it be?
5. Was any independent third-party assessment of traffic, school capacity, or environmental impact ever conducted? If not, will the new board commission one before any future development decisions in the Lusby Town Center?

Something missing or incorrect?

If you have documentation relevant to this project, or believe something here is inaccurate, submit it for review.

Submit information